Performance information is important for effective management, including planning, budgeting, implementation, reporting, monitoring and evaluation. The matrix below outlines the performance indicators and targets that the NLC identified to achieve in the 2017/18 financial year. These performance indicators and targets are aligned across the NLC’s annual plans, budgets, in-year and annual report.
The NLC achieved 100% performance against its predetermined objectives and targets therefore no corrective actions were identified.
Strategic objectives, outputs, performance indicators, planned targets and actual achievements
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
|
NLDTF disbursements | 2.1 | Percentage disbursement of grants as per GNR644, 6(c)(iv) |
At least 65% of grants be paid in line with the regulated 60-day timeframe |
65% disbursement of grants |
ACHIEVED 66% of grants were disbursed. This target aims to ensure timeous payment of grants to beneficiaries once all legal conditions have been fulfilled. It stems from Regulation (GNR644) which stipulates that payment must be effected within 60 days of receipt of a compliant grant agreement. |
||
NLDTF investments | 2.3 | Percentage return on investments (ROI) of NLDTF funds |
An annual minimum of 8% ROI on NLDTF funds |
8% return on investments |
ACHIEVED
|
|||
Provincial procurement | 2.4 | Percentage of localised procurement |
90% localisation of procurement for provincial offices |
80% localisation of procurement for provincial offices |
ACHIEVED 99% localised provincial procurement. This measures the percentage of goods and services procured by the provincial offices in order to stimulate growth of local businesses of the region in which the provincial offices operate. It is also important as it ensures Compliance with government priorities e.g The Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Act, 2003 (No. 53 of 2003) (B-BBEE), Local Procurement and Skills Transfer. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
Illegal lotteries | 3.1 | Percentage investigations on reported and identified illegal lotteries |
Conduct investigations on 85% of all identified and reported illegal lotteries |
75% of investigations conducted | ACHIEVED 96% of identified and reported illegal lotteries investigated. Illegal lotteries contravene the provisions of the Act and its applicable regulations and related statutes. The matter of illegal lotteries has a direct bearing on an enabling environment for the National Lottery in that it affects the revenue generated from ticket sales. Illegal schemes continue to create significant competition for the National Lottery and further create confusion to lottery players. Illegal lotteries are identified through:
|
||||||
3.2 | Feasibility study on regulation of illegal lotteries |
Conduct a feasibility study to determine the regulation of illegal lotteries |
Research on illegal lotteries conducted |
ACHIEVED Feasibility study conducted and the final report tabled and approved by Board. In 2016, a study was conducted to determine the “Impact and Extent of Illegal Lotteries to the National Lottery in South Africa”. This target is a follow-on from the research that was conducted in order to provide direction to the NLC in terms of regulating illegal lotteries. |
||||||||
Third Lottery Licence | 3.3 | Implement and monitor third National Lottery Licence Monitoring Matrix/ Scorecard |
Implement and monitor compliance with the licence conditions |
Implement and monitor compliance with the licence conditions |
ACHIEVED Compliance by the operator with licence conditions implemented. The National Lottery operator is monitored against licence conditions in this target. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
Regulation 3A(1)(a) | 4.1 | Percentage of applications adjudicated within 150 days |
75% of applications adjudicated within 150 days |
50% of applications adjudicated within 150 days |
ACHIEVED 81% of applications were adjudicated within the legislated 150 days. Regulation 3A. (1) reads as follows: In assessing an application for a grant in accordance with Regulation (3)(b), a Distribution Agency must:
|
|||||||||||||
Lotteries Act – 5% per province (GNR182) | 4.2 | Percentage allocation of grant funding to provinces |
A minimum of 5% grant funding allocated to each province |
A minimum of 5% grant funding allocated to each province |
ACHIEVED
GNR 182 regulation states: “Any agency shall for the purposes of section 32(1)(b) of the Act in considering grant applications ensure that not less than five percent of the total amount at the disposal of the agency for grants, shall in any financial year of the board be allocated for distribution in respect of every province of the Republic.” The importance of this target is that it ensures fair and equitable distribution of funds. |
||||||||||||||
Monitoring and evaluation of NLDTF funding | 4.3 | Number of monitoring and evaluation site visits conducted |
Conduct 2 000 monitoring and evaluation site visits |
1 500 monitoring and evaluation site visits |
ACHIEVED 2 333 site visits conducted (Q1-Q4) NLC has strengthened its monitoring and evaluation systems to enabling the organisation to better measure the impact of funding. The M&E division will in the year implement monitoring and evaluation visits by conducting 2 000 site visits to beneficiaries as per the framework. |
||||||||||||||
4.4 | Number of provincial impact evaluation studies |
Conduct impact evaluation study in five provinces |
1 500 monitoring and evaluation site visits |
ACHIEVED The evaluation study was conducted. One of key roles of the National Lotteries Commission (NLC) is its funding of non-profit organisations that play a role in the development of society through various initiatives. The impact evaluation study focused on funded projects between the period 2012 – 2016 to assess the changes that have been brought about in the lives of the individuals and communities. |
: To enhance administration, ensure compliance with applicable legislation and policy prescripts
Name of sub- programme |
Final appropriation R’000 |
Actual expenditure R’000 |
(Over)/Under expenditure R’000 |
Reason for variance |
|
Knowledge management | 2 500 | 2 500 | – | ||
Education and awareness | 1 866 | 979 | 887 | The provinces were responsible with conducting the education and awareness workshops and as a result the budget that was set aside by Business Development division was not utilised. | |
E–system (Integrated enterprise- wide architecture platform) |
36 109 | 30 675 | 5 434 | A payment relating to software cost that was procured during the 2017/18 year and paid in the current year was erroneously budgeted for under this item. | |
Corporate governance | 111 | 111 | – | ||
Total | 40 586 | 34 265 | 6 321 |
: To ensure financial sustainability, control and discipline in line with applicable legislation and policy prescripts
Name of sub- programme |
Final appropriation R’000 |
Actual expenditure R’000 |
(Over)/Under expenditure R’000 |
Reason
for variance |
|
NLDTF disbursements |
2 073 514 | 2 073 514 | – | ||
NLDTF investments |
– | – | – | ||
Provincial procurement |
16 475 | 10 314 | 6 161 | Facilities was responsible for payment of security and hygiene services for provinces during this financial year and that resulted in provinces not spending the budget for security service, this responsibility has, however, been taken to provinces going forward. The provinces did not have their planned functional strategy sessions and they plan to have them at the beginning of quarter one of 2018/19 financial year. Provinces found ways to save costs by using municipal halls and schools for their educational and awareness workshops and also stopped providing catering for workshops. | |
Total | 2 089 989 | 2 083 828 | 6 161 |
: To implement relevant initiatives geared towards ensuring compliance with the Act
Name of sub- programme |
Final appropriation R’000 |
Actual expenditure R’000 |
(Over)/Under expenditure R’000 |
Reason
for variance |
|
Name of sub- programme |
Final appropriation R’000 |
Actual expenditure R’000 |
(Over)/Under expenditure R’000 |
Reason
for variance |
|
Illegal lotteries | 2 299 | 1 177 | 1 122 | ||
3rd lottery licence | 493 | 493 | – | Due to the delays when conducting the feasibility study, the development of the society model was placed on hold. | |
Total | 2 792 | 1 670 | 1 122 |
: To ensure fair and equitable grant allocations
Name of sub- programme |
Final appropriation R’000 |
Actual expenditure R’000 |
(Over)/Under expenditure R’000 |
Reason
for variance |
|
Name of sub- programme |
Final appropriation R’000 |
Actual expenditure R’000 |
(Over)/Under expenditure R’000 |
Reason
for variance |
|
Regulation 3A(1)(a) | – | – | – | ||
Lotteries Act – 5% per province (GNR182) |
1 441 564 | 1 494 013 | 52 449 | ||
Monitoring and evaluation of NLDTF funding |
– | – | – | The Charities Sector allocated funds for few proactive projects and was also clearing applications from 2015 call of application. | |
Total | 1 441 564 | 1 494 013 | 52 449 |